<

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

This is Disturbing

This is Disturbing
Thanking GOD That HE led me to use KING JAMES only ...a long time ago


http://www.av1611.org/nkjv.html <<>

I am fully aware of this being an OLD symbol of the 'trinity'

that has it's roots in GNOSTICISM which we are WARNED OF IN THE NEW TESTAMENT!

DON'T be coming to me with 'abominable doctrines of men' to defend doctrines of devils.

IF YOU LOVE GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART AND MIND AND SOUL, THEN YOU WILL HATE THE EVIL, TOO!

HOW dare people take away " LORD " from GOD'S HOLY WORD even 1 time! Yet these 'people' do it time and time and time and time again! Amidst many other atrocities....read the research and you, too, will be shocked and offended at their cavalier attitude when it came to TOUCHING the HOLY WORD of ALMIGHTY GOD!

HOW they dare to remove whole passages!

HOW DARE THEY! And then 'pass it off' as just another translation.!

ABOMINATION!

ABOMINATION THAT'S WHAT IT IS!

  • Who were the King James translators?
  • ARTICLES ON BIBLE VERSION ISSUE
  • BIBLE VERSION VERSE COMPARISON CHARTS--WHAT'S IN YOUR BIBLE?
  • The King James 1611 vs. ALL Modern Versions (scripture comparison, hereticks that worked on new versions, popery's involvement, etc.)
  • Inspiration and Translation
    By Bruce Lackey. Is it correct to call a translation the "inspired word of God?"

    NKJV Examined, The
    By M. H. Reynolds. A brief examination of the New King James Version.

    NIV is a Really Bad Translation, The (1/2), (2/2)
    By Richard Bacon. Gives several examples of translation blunders in the New International Version. Originally posted on the FIDO messages system.

    Homosexuality and the NIV [External Link]
    By David Cloud. Detailes on this influence in the translation process of the New International Version.

    Erasmus, King James, and His Translators (1/3), (2/3), (3/3)
    By David H. Sorenson. Answers various charges against Erasmus, King James, and the KJV translators. The third section gives some details on who the translators of the KJV were.

    Fourfold Superiority of the King James Version, The (1/2), (2/2)
    By D.A. Waite. Discusses the superiority of the KJV's text, translators, technique, and theology.

    Brief Introduction to the Bible Version Controversy, A
    Brandon Scraggs wrote this several years ago to give a short introduction to the issue at hand.

  • Is the Fight for the KJV Necessary?
    By Gary Freeman.
  • NKJV Examined, The
    By M. H. Reynolds. A brief examination of the New King James Version.
  • Is the NKJV an improvement of the KJV?
  • Verse Charts - The King James Bible Page
  • ARTICLES ON BIBLE VERSION ISSUE
  • BIBLE VERSION VERSE COMPARISON CHARTS--WHAT'S IN YOUR BIBLE?
  • The King James 1611 vs. ALL Modern Versions (scripture comparison, hereticks that worked on new versions, popery's involvement, etc.)

    yeshuaessenor at 8:42:00 PM EDT (Link to this entry)
    This entry has 1 comments: (Add your own)
      I agree, I always felt like anything other than the king James was to watered down. I want it all! :)

      angelrose
      Comment from angelrose2u - 8/30/05 10:34 PM
  • 0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    << Home

    home

    LOVE: This is Disturbing

    Fire of GOD

    Get awesome blog templates like this one from BlogSkins.com