Wednesday, July 20, 2005
♥♪ BY THY BIRTH AND BY THY TEARS ♥♪
Dinosaur soft tissue find—a stunning rebuttal of “millions of years”
25 March 2005
We previously announced the discovery of what seemed to be microscopic red blood cells (and immunological evidence of hemoglobin) in dinosaur bone (see Sensational dinosaur blood report! and response to critic).1 Now a further announcement, involving the same scientist (Montana State University’s Dr Mary Schweitzer2) stretches (pun intentional) the long-age paradigm beyond belief.
Not only have more blood cells been found, but also soft, fibrous tissue, and complete blood vessels. The fact that this really is unfossilized soft tissue from a dinosaur is in this instance so obvious to the naked eye that any scepticism directed at the previous discovery is completely “history”.
Science via AP(From www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7285683/)
A: The arrow points to a tissue fragment that is still elastic. It beggars belief that elastic tissue like this could have lasted for 65 million years.
B: Another instance of “fresh appearance” which similarly makes it hard to believe in the “millions of years”.
C: Regions of bone showing where the fibrous structure is still present, compared to most fossil bones which lack this structure. But these bones are claimed to be 65 million years old, yet they manage to retain this structure.
One description of a portion of the tissue was that it is “flexible and resilient and when stretched returns to its original shape”.3
The exciting discovery was apparently made when researchers were forced to break open the leg bone of a Tyrannosaurus rex fossil to lift it by helicopter. The bone was still largelyhollow and not filled up with minerals as is usual. Dr Schweitzer used chemicals to dissolve the bony matrix, revealing the soft tissue still present.4
Click here to Read the whole story at:
yeshuaessenor at 8:45:00 AM EDT (Link to this entry)
Institute for Creation Research is an organization of Christian Scientists and they have alot of information on this subject.
I've also heard, (I'm pretty sure it was from them - I used to partner with them awhile back)
that in England the 'dragons' of legends could very well have been 'dinosaurs' as we call them today.
and that on Noah's ark, if they were 'young' dinos it is feasable that they could very well have been aboard.
Personally, to me: Leviathan definitely sounds like a dinosaur!
so...if you are willing to take time to research what Christian scientists have found out: ICR actually has a whole page with this title:
"Where do dinosaurs fit in with the Biblical record?"
& this is the URL:
http://www.icr.org/index.php?
I hope this helps!
Love in CHRIST
Comment from onlyjesusaves - 7/23/05 9:15 PM
angelrose
Comment from angelrose2u - 7/21/05 3:51 PM
posted by JESUSisLORD
@ 2:27 PM
BROADBAND
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home